Marisol de la Cadena & Isabelle Stengers Mihnea Tanasescu (mod.)

How Large is a Person? Breaking through singular ways of being and knowing

How Large is a Person?
How Large is a Person?


The person is first and foremost an idea, to think of it in terms of a particular embodiment is to be within a tradition that forces the idea of personhood into a particular shape. In the western world, this has been an imagined rational, individual human of a particular class. This way of thinking is neither the only one nor the most fruitful – it hides the different ways of knowing inherent within multiplicity.

During this evening, we will explore how human personhood has been constructed, and how it can be decentered and made to expand into different ways of seeing and being. Through critical anthropology and the philosophy of science, we will pick through the rich epistemological and ontological heritage of different ways of being in the world, and different ways of building knowledge. The rational, universal individual has violently suppressed mutable persons existing at the intersection of multiple beings, as well as collective and interspecies ways of building knowledge that persist in the sciences, though often unrecognized. Underneath the steamroller of modernity, we will discover many possibilities for a more convivial future.

20:00 – Introduction by Mihnea Tanasescu 
20:10 – Keynote Lecture by Marisol de la Cadena : ‘Runa, human but not only.’ 
20:40 – Introducing the work of Isabelle Stengers, through a Q&A with Isabelle Stengers and Mihnea Tanasescu
20:50 – Q&A with Isabelle Stengers and Marisol de la Cadena, moderated by Mihnea Tanasescu 
21:30 – Video performance by Mandrill Kin
21:40 – Outro

Marisol de la Cadena is a Professor of Anthropology at the University of California, Davis. She is the author of Earth Beings. Ecologies of Practice Across Andean Worlds (2015) and Cultures of Race and Hybridity in Latin America (2011), among others. With Mario Blaser, she co-edited A World of Many Worlds (2018) and The Uncommons (2017). 

Mihnea Tanasescu is a political ecologist working in the Political Science Department of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. He has worked on the political representation of natural entities as well as nature conservation, restoration, and rewilding in Europe. He has two forthcoming books, one on the movement for giving rights to nature, and another on the political significance of environmental catastrophe.

Isabelle Stengers is emerita of the Université Libre de Bruxelles. After graduating in chemistry she has turned to philosophy, and as a doctoral student, she has worked in Ilya Prigogine physical chemistry department. Her first work with Prigogine and her dissertation was about the contrast between the conceptual inventiveness of physics and its claim to propose a general world view. This has led her to develop a critique of the model of objectivity that mimics theoretical-experimental sciences and silences the diverging multiplicity of scientific practices. In this perspective, she has proposed, as a challenge inseparably political and cultural, the concept of an active ecology of practices, embedded within a democratic, demanding environment. Her work as a philosopher defends the possibility of speculative, adventurous constructivism, which she relates to the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze, Alfred North Whitehead and William James as well as with the anthropology of Bruno Latour and the SF thinking adventure of Donna Haraway. Among her books published in English translation; Order out of Chaos with Ilya Prigogine, The Invention of Modern Science, Capitalist Sorcery: Breaking the Spell with Philippe Pignarre, Cosmopolitics I and II, Thinking with Whitehead and Women Who Make a Fuss with Vinciane Despret, In Catastrophic Times. Resisting the Coming Barbarism; Another Science is Possible

part of A Series of More-Than-Human Encounters, curated by Kaaitheater & Crosstalks in dialogue with Gosie Vervloessem, Olave Nduwanje, Mihnea Tanasescu & Marialena Marouda